May.31

Toxic, radioactive garbage lingers in WWII-era dump at former Donaldson Air Force Base

An old, contaminated landfill at the former Donaldson Air Force Base in Greenville — home to nearly 100 companies in what is now a 2,600-acre industrial park — poses a high risk to human health, according to data compiled by the investigative group ProPublica.

Donaldson is among thousands of former military installations nationwide with lingering pollution issues, according to ProPublica. The group’s data drew from the U.S. Department of Defense’s Environmental Restoration Program, which lists 61 current or former military installations in South Carolina that need environmental cleanup.

Of the 61 South Carolina sites, 11 are in the Upstate. Of those 11, Donaldson poses the highest risk to human health and the environment.

The Formerly Used Defense Sites (FUDS) program of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers tracks and mitigates pollution at old military installations according to their severity and as money and time allow, said Billy Birdwell,  senior public affairs specialist for the corps’ Savannah District.

Work at Donaldson will commence early next year, he said.

“Those with almost no risk go way at the bottom,” Birdwell said. “We rack and stack them and take care of people the best we can.”

Records show that Donaldson is among a handful of installations statewide — six all told and most of them on the coast — that the defense department has deemed high risk, meaning imminent risk to human health, safety and the environment, according to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Those are:

  • Conway Bomb and Gunnery Range (military munitions and explosives), Horry County
  • Fort Jackson (the explosive agent RDX has contaminated several residential wells), Richland County
  • Parris Island Marine Corps Recruit Depot (spill site), Beaufort County
  • Beaufort Marine Corps Air Station (underground storage tanks), Beaufort
  • Joint Base Charleston Weapons Station (maintenance yard and landfill), North Charleston
  • Donald Air Force Base (contaminated landfill), Greenville

Two South Carolina sites are rated low risk — including the old Isaqueena Lake bombing range outside Clemson — and 12 are medium risk. Another 32 have a “response complete” designation, and the remaining eight haven’t been evaluated.

According to ProPublica, some “completed” sites are simply restricted or fenced off to keep the public away.

Donaldson operated as a military installation until 1964. During World War II, the airfield operated a skip-bombing school at Isaqueena Lake, nestled at the center of the Clemson Experimental Forest. Bombers practiced hitting targets on the water with dummy bombs, hundreds of which were found at the bottom of the lake when it was drained for environmental work in 1954.

Still, the corps has found the risk of finding any unexploded ordnance under the water low: Most of the practice bombs were stuffed with sand and black powder, according to historical accounts.

More serious is the old landfill at Donaldson Air Force Base, which has been the property of the city and county of Greenville for more than 50 years. Today, a nonprofit called the South Carolina Aviation and Technology Center (SCTAC) manages the site.

The Savannah District of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers oversees all cleanup projects for formerly used defense sites (FUDS) in South Carolina and across the Southeast, said Birdwell. Two years ago this work included rendering inert scores of live Civil War-era cannon shot recovered from the Savannah Harbor.

Birdwell said the problems at Donaldson stem from an old dumping site.

Corps scientists have detected trace amounts of hazardous, toxic and radioactive material in the ground water, soil, surface water and sediments around the old dump. These include chromium, mercury, cadmium, the carcinogenic cleaning agent trichloroethylene (TCE), and tetrachloroethylene (PCE), a cancer-causing solvent once used widely in the textile industry.

“We’re not talking about an engineered landfill that you would find in use by a municipality or a commercial operation today,” Birdwell wrote in a email to The News. “This is more of a dump site. During (World War II) we had no environmental science to guide us. We disposed of items in the most convenient way. That meant dumping it, occasionally throwing some dirt on top and moving on with the war effort. We’re fixing that mess now.”

SCTAC’s president and CEO, Jody Bryson, could not be reached for comment, and SCTAC spokeswoman Kara Dullea said she was not aware of the ProPublica report. She declined to comment.

“SCTAC has not received any notice of this but says issues such as this would be the responsibility of the Army Corps of Engineers,” she wrote in an email.

Among the biggest tenants at SCTAC for the past 30 years is Lockheed Martin, which operates an aircraft modification, maintenance, repair and overhaul plant there and has more than 500 employees. With the expected move of F-16 production to the site, another 250 people are expected to come work there.

The ProPublica report said the Donaldson dump site poses a risk to visitors and workers who might be exposed to contaminated soil in the industrial park. It also said anyone wading in nearby streams could be exposed to particles in the water or sediment. Residents of the area also could be exposed through consumption of groundwater.

“We take this seriously, but these are common issues we find at former airfields,” Birdwell said. “TCE and other things — I’ve seen all this before many times at other locations.”

Final action on the Donaldson site will be to make sure that at least two feet of clean top soil covers the entire dormer dump site, Birdwell said. The work will involve heavy equipment and will likely continue through 2021, according to military records.

“We expect to have a contractor there within the first three months of 2018,” Birdwell said.

According to Department of Defense records, the removal of underground storage tanks and other cleanup at Donaldson had already cost the government $21.4 million through July 2016. The remaining work will cost an additional $13.9 million to complete.

Local

May.08

Coinbase Alert: Amazon Is Coming

amazoncoinbase – 

Coinbase Alert: Amazon Is Coming

Amazon is to the 21st century what Walmart was to the 20th century.  Slowly, Amazon is putting its imprint onto more and more areas of business.  Already AMZN is one of the world most valuable companies worth more than $725 billion.  Their sheer size allows them to go wherever they want. Last year’s jumbo acquisition of Whole Foods is a good example.

From these moves, it is clear that Amazon intends to avoid becoming the “one trick pony” that its rival Apple has succeeded in becoming.  That means that Amazon must forever be searching for giant technology centric markets. Cryptocurrency may be on the horizon.

Just yesterday the U.S. Patent Office issued # 9,947,033 to Amazon for software titled Streaming Data Marketplace.  CNBC first reported the headlines.  Here are some direct excerpts from the patent application:

Streaming analytics technologies hold the promise of making vast volumes of data available in a low latency fashion. However, while prior technologies may be able to provide data in a low latency fashion, the raw data may have low value (or have less valuable than the data could have) until the raw data is enhanced by correlating the raw data with additional data, such as by matching records using common values.

One example is a data stream that publishes or includes global bitcoin transactions (or any cryptocurrency transaction). These transactions are completely visible to each participant in the network. The raw transaction data may have little meaning to a customer unless the customer has a way to correlate various elements of the stream with other useful data.

For example, a group of electronic or internet retailers who accept bitcoin transactions may have a shipping address that may correlate with the bitcoin address. The electronic retailers may combine the shipping address with the bitcoin transaction data to create correlated data and republish the combined data as a combined data stream.

A group of telecommunications providers may subscribe downstream to the combined data stream and be able to correlate the IP (Internet Protocol) addresses of the transactions to countries of origin. Government agencies may be able to subscribe downstream and correlate tax transaction data to help identify transaction participants.

 

Translating Into English

 

Amazon filed this patent back in 2014 so it is obvious that cryptocurrencies were not the only application they had in mind for their Streaming Data Marketplace.  That doesn’t change the fact that crypto has evolved in value to over $300 billion and adoption of bitcoin by Amazon would be a major legitimizing force in the whole crypto movement.

The one big thing standing in the way of acceptance of a large number of relatively small value transactions is liquidity (speed) and Amazon vendors profits could be enhanced or completely wiped out by crypto volatility.  Before getting all excited, the Streaming Data Marketplace would need to address this issue.

Without trying to get into the techno garbodigook, one way to address the problem would be for Amazon to create their own massive crypto exchange that not only provided low latency transactions but serve as yet another Amazon service.  Just using the Amazon name would bring enormous credibility.

 

The Value Of the Data

After reading through the patent, it is obvious there are many applications to be developed. Helping regulators may be one of those. Here is what the patent application states.

For example, a law enforcement agency may be a customer and may desire to receive global bitcoin transactions, correlated by country, with ISP data to determine source IP addresses and shipping addresses that correlate to bitcoin addresses.  The agency may not want additional available enhancements such as local bank data records.

 

Good Or Bad For Bitcoin (And Others)

Is having all of the additional data available to law enforcement and other regulators a good or bad thing?  After all, doesn’t this take away all the anonymity that attracted so many to cryptocurrencies in the first place?

There are arguments on both sides of this issue but I think the benefits are worth some consideration.  The biggest is that if Amazon and all of its vendors have a mechanism in place to accept payment in bitcoin, this is a huge plus.  The day this happens eBay and virtually every other online merchant will get with the game. And let’s remember we are talking about far more than just bitcoin.  The downside is that if you have obtained your crypto from some questionable activities or wish to maintain your anonymity, stay away from online shopping.

 

Source: hacked.com

Tech